{"id":142152,"date":"2015-10-08T15:15:53","date_gmt":"2015-10-08T15:15:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/force11.org\/the-future-is-a-happy-place\/"},"modified":"2022-05-26T13:45:42","modified_gmt":"2022-05-26T13:45:42","slug":"the-future-is-a-happy-place","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/force11.org\/post\/the-future-is-a-happy-place\/","title":{"rendered":"The Future is a Happy Place"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"ct_body\">\n<p>Last July, I attended the very rewarding <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dagstuhl.de\/de\/programm\/kalender\/semhp\/?semnr=15302\">Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop on Open Science and e-Science in Psychology and the Behavioral Sciences.<\/a>&nbsp; I had always regretted missing the workshop that led to the founding of FORCE11 and so was thrilled to finally make it there four years later.&nbsp; So much has happened since then that it&rsquo;s hard to believe that the idea of FORCE11 is only four years old.<\/p>\n<p>At Dagstuhl, we did a mini version of what I had wanted to do on a large scale for some time: Defining the Scholarly Commons. I had been inspired by the <a href=\"\/f11_tool\/?A=L25vZGUvNjIxMg==&amp;\">1K Challenge submission by Sarah Callaghan<\/a> at the FORCE2015 meeting.&nbsp; What if we just started from scratch and designed a system for current technology instead of trying to adapt our current pre-digital system?&nbsp; Such an exercise would cause us to examine our assumptions about the way things should be. And,&nbsp; once we knew what a system should look like, we could see how close we were to achieving it.<\/p>\n<p>At the Dagstuhl workshop, quite spontaneously, the group decided to go through just this exercise.&nbsp; We considered both the future and the present of scholarly communication from the perspective of the psychology and the behavioral sciences.&nbsp; We imagined what the future could be like, freed from the restrictions of our current publishing paradigm and skewed reward system.&nbsp; We then matched that vision against the tools we have to see how close we are. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I was fortunate enough to be in the Future group and the marvelous system we envisioned had information of all sorts flowing unfettered through the scholarly workflow.&nbsp; At all stages, researchers interacted with the community, accessing expertise as it was needed to make their work better.&nbsp; Automated tools removed unnecessary drudgery and processes enforced sound science.&nbsp; <a href=\"\/dont-publish-release\/\">We didn&rsquo;t publish, we released!&nbsp;<\/a> While sitting on the beach of course.&nbsp; What did we publish?&nbsp; Research objects of all shapes and sizes:&nbsp; data, code, workflows, narrative.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And the future was a forgiving place; when mistakes were made, they were corrected even after the study was completed.&nbsp; Such mistakes weren&rsquo;t a cause for alarm, but a celebration of&nbsp; the self-correcting nature of science.&nbsp; The one who reported the error was thanked;&nbsp; the one who corrected it was applauded. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Journals were there, but they competed for the scholar&rsquo;s work, which resided in the Commons and was available to all, human and otherwise.&nbsp; All the money that now went to locking up information went to making it free.&nbsp; Editors acted as agents and journals sold their insight into important works and their tools for using content effectively, not the content itself.&nbsp; Oh, and the journals paid scholars for their works;&nbsp; not the other way around. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Every now and then, participants in the workshop tried to bring us back to the present with buzz-kills like:&nbsp; &ldquo;what&rsquo;s the incentive?&rdquo;.&nbsp; But such negativity was banished;&nbsp; the future was a happy place.<\/p>\n<p>Many noted that the happy future could be here right now;&nbsp; indeed, it looked a lot like the open software community.&nbsp; But I sadly shook my head;&nbsp; the future isn&rsquo;t here.&nbsp; The tools really aren&rsquo;t ready and neither is much of the behavioral community.&nbsp; There still are no incentives, and those trying to make it in our current system have little choice but to perpetuate it.&nbsp; Those of us in the open science community painted a rosy picture, but the practicing psychologists among us clearly thought our vision was science fiction.<\/p>\n<p>But, perhaps not. The ensuring discussion made it clear that though the future may not be here yet, we transition a little more every day.&nbsp; We don&#039;t know everything but we know some things. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In fact, my contention is that that we know the basics of how something we are calling the Scholarly Commons should operate.&nbsp; And I believe that we can now articulate clearly what is needed to get there, with practical recommendations on how communities at different stages can come along too.&nbsp; I also suspect we can provide incentives commensurate with the effort required.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I say this with a Mona Lisa&nbsp;smile;&nbsp; I&rsquo;m not going to tell you how because I&rsquo;d like to hear what you have to say.&nbsp; I&rsquo;d like to know if all of those working in this area have started to coalesce around a shared vision and the means to achieve it. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And thanks to an award from the <a href=\"\/helmsley-charitable-trust-funds-force11-to-develop-scholarly-commons-of-the-future\/\">Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust to FORCE11<\/a>, we can do just that.&nbsp; We will be engaging the FORCE11 community and our allies around the world to articulate their visions for the Scholarly Commons.&nbsp; What principles, best practices, standards should govern the flow of scholarly objects across the digital ecosystem? &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>If we truly share a vision and believe we have the means to get there, we will be able to collate and organize the necessary materials to serve as a blueprint for any community that is ready for change. My personal goal is to empower every researcher and scholar across disciplines who wakes up one morning and says &ldquo;it doesn&rsquo;t have to be like this-there&rsquo;s a better way&rdquo;.&nbsp; Not just with high level goals like the FORCE11 Manifesto, but with concrete steps to take and appropriate tools to back them up.<\/p>\n<p>The future truly is a happy place and I hope you will join us in bringing us there.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"ct_meta\"><span class=\"ct_label\">Archive:<\/span>&nbsp;<a class=\"ct_archive\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/archive.force11.net\/node\/6699\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/archive.force11.net\/node\/6699<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last July, I attended the very rewarding Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop on Open Science and e-Science in Psychology and the Behavioral Sciences.&nbsp; I had always regretted missing the workshop that led to the founding of FORCE11 and so was thrilled to finally make it there four years later.&nbsp; So much has happened since then that it&rsquo;s &#8230; <a title=\"The Future is a Happy Place\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/force11.org\/post\/the-future-is-a-happy-place\/\" aria-label=\"More on The Future is a Happy Place\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":205957,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"advgb_blocks_editor_width":"","advgb_blocks_columns_visual_guide":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[182],"tags":[],"force11":[],"blog_series":[],"working_group":[],"class_list":["post-142152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog"],"acf":[],"author_meta":{"display_name":"Maryann Martone","author_link":"\/members\/maryann-martone"},"featured_img":null,"coauthors":[],"tax_additional":{"categories":{"linked":["<a href=\"https:\/\/force11.org\/category\/blog\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Blogs<\/a>"],"unlinked":["<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Blogs<\/span>"]}},"comment_count":"0","relative_dates":{"created":"Posted 10 years ago","modified":"Updated 4 years ago"},"absolute_dates":{"created":"Posted on 8 Oct 2015","modified":"Updated on 26 May 2022"},"absolute_dates_time":{"created":"Posted on 8 Oct 2015 15:15","modified":"Updated on 26 May 2022 13:45"},"featured_img_caption":"","series_order":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/205957"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=142152"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142152\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=142152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=142152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=142152"},{"taxonomy":"force11","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/force11?post=142152"},{"taxonomy":"blog_series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog_series?post=142152"},{"taxonomy":"working_group","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/force11.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/working_group?post=142152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}