Comments on: Shake-up for system of credit in scholarly communication https://force11.org/post/shake-up-for-system-of-credit-in-scholarly-communication/ The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship Thu, 26 May 2022 13:42:51 +0000 hourly 1 By: Maryann Martone https://force11.org/post/shake-up-for-system-of-credit-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-11155 Thu, 28 May 2015 02:15:29 +0000 https://staging2.simonw59.sg-host.com/shake-up-for-system-of-credit-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-11155 More reasons to move to a credit system

https://theconversation.com/long-lists-are-eroding-the-value-of-being-a-scientific-author-42094

]]> By: Maryann Martone https://force11.org/post/shake-up-for-system-of-credit-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-11154 Sat, 21 Mar 2015 02:04:24 +0000 https://staging2.simonw59.sg-host.com/shake-up-for-system-of-credit-in-scholarly-communication/#comment-11154 Great work!

I would like this system to extend beyond data and code to all scholarly work.  The Credit Where Credit is Due session at FORCE2015 explored this issue.  So we should get rid of the author line and go to a role based credit system instead.  When we write our research grants, we lay out the contributions of different team members but when we submit a publication, we throw the team out the window.  It's a shame and leads to all sorts of disputes and bad feelings within and across laboratories.  

]]>